kamerm
1/22/2009 3:26:00 PM
"Damaeus" <no-mail@damaeus.yahoo.invalid> wrote in message
news:dbjgn41rjrb6qvi0nain2d7i7645ai6au5@4ax.com...
> Reading from news:alt.religion.wicca,
> "kamerm" <kamermx@yahoo.com> posted:
>
>> ? volume's not illusory. jes means past a certain density, quantum
>> information (which isn't the same as classic info - for one thing,
>> quantum info can't be cloned) is sequestered and not directly
>> observable. Nothing keeps it from being revealed at a later time when
>> density drops. For analogy considered how info in your friend's head is
>> sequestered - you see evidence of its presence, but not its specifics,
>> and can only access it at a certain rate.
>>
>> Damaeus - I sometimes think of the universe being filled with
>> Damaeus - spinnable particles. Spin them to one position, you
>> Damaeus - can't see them. Spin them into others, and you get
>> Damaeus - different colors and transparencies.
>>
>> quantify and propose your symmetries, but in a sci. group, please
>
> Um... you just replied to the same message I replied to with your input.
> Why are you criticizing me for posting about it in this newsgroup, while
> you do the same?
discussing relevance is OT (as you did with your offer and i in response) in
a limited, meta kind of way.
otoh, posting a new set of symmetries, while way cool, would certainly be OT
(though way cool ;-)
imho
-k
> Damaeus
> --
> ____
> / __ \ ____ _ ____ ___ ____ _ ___ __ __ _____
> / / / / / __ `/ / __ `__ \ / __ `/ / _ \ / / / / / ___/
> / /_/ / / /_/ / / / / / / / / /_/ / / __/ / /_/ / (__ )
> /_____/ \__,_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ \__,_/ \___/ \__,_/ /____/
>
> damaeus@damaeus.earthlink.net
> Remove "damaeus" from the domain to reply by e-mail.