Usa Forum - US Government Exports Election Fraud To Belgium

Warhol

12/2/2004 7:18:00 AM

US Government Exports
Election Fraud To Belgium
By Thomas Deflo
Online Journal
12-1-4

On May 18, 2003, the Belgian, Flemish Green Party by the name of Agalev (now
Groen!) got crushed in the Belgian elections. The ecological party
supposedly lost two thirds of its electorate and all its seats in the
federal Parliament. In reality, the election was a fraud, performed on
foreign soil by the CIA with the help of the complicit Belgian State
Security. A very successful coup. It is only now that I dare to write down
my testimony, because I was harassed and intimidated for over a year.

The reason for the coup's success lay in its long preparation. During the
preceding years, Green Party members were criticized and ridiculed in the
majority of media outlets, some falsely accused of judicial wrongdoings.
This propaganda was orchestrated, as the CIA has done in so many other coups
around the world. The source of this propaganda evidently came from the
Belgian CIA-linked State Security, under the direction of Koen Dassen, and
was produced by the US embassy. This relentless attempt to skew the public
mind set, also known as psy-ops, slowly started paying off. The rather
gullible Belgian people absorbed the negative portraying of the ecological
party, with no clue as to the propaganda's real origin nor to its eventual
purpose: to make a total defeat at the election credible. Many media
corporations lost all sense of objectivity and cooperated in order to
effectively destroy the Green Party's public image.

The election fraud was next prepared by a fraudulent poll in an allied
newspaper, exactly one week before voting day. All polls had indicated a
share of around 8% of votes for the Green Party. The fraudulent poll
indicated less than 5%. In Belgium, a party is not allowed to stay in
Parliament if it drops under 5%. A week later elections were held and
miraculously Agalev got exactly 4.9%. The Green Party had to leave the
Parliament and the government. This signified the end of a progressive,
left-wing party in Flemish politics.

Fundamental to a soft coup d'etat, of course, is the vote fraud itself. Just
like in the U.S., Belgians vote mainly by way of touch screen machines. The
system is transparently prone to fraud. The voters receive magnetic cards
which are inserted in the voting machine slot. The cards then register the
votes, and must be retracted from the machine to be brought back to the
local booth computer, swallowing all cards and supposedly adding up their
results on a floppy disk. Upon closure of the voting bureau, all floppy
disks from all voting stations are then centralized in the local city hall
and processed behind closed curtains.

In Belgium, the whole voting chain, by royal law, is controlled by the
Ministry of Interior. Under the veil of 'security,' the counting of the
votes is totally opaque to external, parliamentary oversight. I witnessed
this personally as an official delegate for the Green Party during election
day in the municipality of Schaerbeek. Party delegates were not allowed to
witness the tally: it was strictly forbidden to enter the rooms where the
counting process occurred. Party members simply had to wait for a sheet of
paper with the supposed results to be handed over to them. Present
administrators, not the least the sitting election judge, were as far from
neutral as possible, chanting victory as they 'read' the results for their
preferred party. I was dumbfounded to see how what were clearly party
stooges were in charge of counting the votes.

Fortunately, there is one last hope for a party witness to have some impact
on the voting system: he can write down his remarks in an official document,
which can then be used by the party, if wanted, to file a protest and demand
a recount. This official document is the so-called 'Proces Verbal'. At the
end of the day, however - and here, the suspicion was obvious - the sitting
judge refused to prepare the document. This was in clear violation with the
proper election procedure.

Copyright © 1998-2004 Online Journal. All rights
reserved.

http://onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/120104Deflo/120104...

3 Answers

B. Ranshaw

12/2/2004 1:30:00 PM

What do you think the US did in the Ukraine?
--
......................................
I've talked to a number of my colleagues
and they're equally divided.
Half other them liked John Kerry
and the other half hated George Bush.

-Andy Rooney

Fullator

12/2/2004 8:29:00 PM

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 08:17:41 +0100, "Warhol" <molarh@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>
>Fortunately, there is one last hope for a party witness to have some impact
>on the voting system: he can write down his remarks in an official document,
>which can then be used by the party, if wanted, to file a protest and demand
>a recount. This official document is the so-called 'Proces Verbal'. At the
>end of the day, however - and here, the suspicion was obvious - the sitting
>judge refused to prepare the document. This was in clear violation with the
>proper election procedure.
>
>Copyright © 1998-2004 Online Journal. All rights
>reserved.
>
>http://onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/120104Deflo/120104...
>
>
Komaan Stefaan, we hebben je herkend! Doe die sinterklaasbaard af.

Dit was dus je volgende initiatief. De grote defloratie!

Hoe 'gullible' denk je dat de Vlamingen wel zijn? Iedereen weet toch
dat als de Staatsveiligheid er zich echt had mee gemoeid, de Groenen
nog hopen stemmen zouden hebben bijgewonnen! Die mannen bereiken toch
altijd precies het omgekeerde van wat ze willen realiseren?

Ik wacht met spanning op je volgende poging.

"Point n'est besoin........" etc. etc.

Fullator

Warhol

12/12/2004 4:37:00 PM

"B. Ranshaw" <nospam.br@cogeco.ca> a écrit dans le message de news:
8NErd.14370$hp3.2184967@read2.cgocable.net...
>
> What do you think the US did in the Ukraine?
> --

A trap for Europe, and the final result will be War.

soc.culture.belgium

US Government Exports Election Fraud To Belgium

Warhol

B. Ranshaw

Fullator

Warhol

x Login to ForumsZone