[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Usa Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

alt.games.warcraft

LFR (mostly) fun

Catriona R

10/17/2012 8:35:00 PM


Whew, cleared Mogu'shan Vaults tonight (first night both halves were
open), and... fun fights, horrible people is the best I can say :-P

First half I'd seen before so had some idea, but others hadn't, fair
enough IMO, it's only been out a week, no need to stress over it. But,
of course, the usual lovely people having a right go at "noobs" who
aren't psychic and don't happen to know the finer points of each
fight. Plus mad pulling by people who haven't noticed that this is not
Dragon Soul and blue-geared healers do not actually have infinite
mana... which resulted in a rather hilarious situation on the 2nd boss
where me and another healer got locked out, having dared to stop for a
drink for 5 seconds, and somebody pulled before we could cross the
wall. You can guess how that went with only 4 healers :-P Well, it
went better on the second try lol. At least people actually bothered
to use the totems on the 3rd boss, progress on last week!

Second half was even worse on the attitudes front frankly, I stuck a
tank on ignore early on for being so damn patronising towards us
"scrubs" who hadn't seen the fight before, and who didn't have the
psychic ability to understand exactly what he meant by "out" (I moved
out, clearly not far enough out but, erm, why not state *clearly*
before the boss when it's so important, then?). 3rd boss was a mess of
insults, reported someone for swearing at the healers and really
should've ignored a rogue for being sarky at the healers all the time
(funnily enough he was kinda low on my priorities for the rest of the
run). Here's a hint: if you're not being healed, it's for a good
reason, like, I dunno, we've run ourselves oom and blown all cds
trying to cover for the one dc'd healer (fair enough, stuff happens
and he was healing his heart out when he returned) and the idiot
healer who decided afk'ing for dinner was more important than his raid
(he tried to avoid a kick by claiming he was the highest healer on the
previous fights... right before the vote went through lol).

For all that, the bossfights themselves are fun, there's a lot to keep
track of, it feels rather complicated to me but I got the general idea
by the end, and hopefully after a few weeks most people will
understand them better and we might have a little less insults flying
round raidchat... :-P My loot luck was terrible, no drops at all,
right up to the last boss, who kindly gave me a spirit trinket when I
spent a coin for a 2nd roll - perfect, as my 2nd trinket was by far my
worst slot, massive upgrade for me! :-) Roll on next week, and
hopefully more luck, less stress.
3 Answers

Polarhound

10/17/2012 9:30:00 PM

0

Last night, 24 of us in my guild ran it as a group.

The one pug? A tank, of course :)

Being that we've already cleared in on 25, and 2 of the groups did it an
additional week on 10, the gear is already there for the most part so we
just blasted through things. The pug tank, however, was probably
pulling his hair out because we were already able to brute-force through
just about everything.

David Hartung

12/11/2013 10:36:00 PM

0

On 12/11/2013 02:22 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
> In article <Bb2dnQQvLbICLzXPnZ2dnUVZ_rGdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>
>>> The baker is a law breaker
>>
>> No, the Judge is.
>
> What law did they break? The laws we agree to live under set up judges to make
> decide over our conflicts. We might not like the decisions, but the judge isn't
> there to be liked. The decision can be appealed and the trial judge's
> interpretation reviewed. If overturned, it doesn't mean the judge broke the law,
> but interpretted the law inappropriately, and that has been corrected.

In my opinion the Judge unconstitutionally ignored the owner's right to
exercise his faith. The baker's refusal to do a wedding cake was
predicated on his understanding of the faith he confesses. Since no one
would be hurt by allowing such exercise of his religion, the state has
no right to demand that the baker act contrary to his faith.

Sid9

12/11/2013 11:01:00 PM

0


"David Hartung" <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote in message
news:dvydncqmXcsqdTXPnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@giganews.com...
> On 12/11/2013 02:22 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
>> In article <Bb2dnQQvLbICLzXPnZ2dnUVZ_rGdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>> David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> The baker is a law breaker
>>>
>>> No, the Judge is.
>>
>> What law did they break? The laws we agree to live under set up judges to
>> make
>> decide over our conflicts. We might not like the decisions, but the judge
>> isn't
>> there to be liked. The decision can be appealed and the trial judge's
>> interpretation reviewed. If overturned, it doesn't mean the judge broke
>> the law,
>> but interpretted the law inappropriately, and that has been corrected.
>
> In my opinion the Judge unconstitutionally ignored the owner's right to
> exercise his faith. The baker's refusal to do a wedding cake was
> predicated on his understanding of the faith he confesses. Since no one
> would be hurt by allowing such exercise of his religion, the state has no
> right to demand that the baker act contrary to his faith.
>

You "opinion" is recognized to be worthless.