Vincent
12/6/2010 9:24:00 AM
On 6 déc, 01:52, The Lasombra <TheLasom...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 12:56:47 -0800, "Kevin M." wrote:
> >> Deck Name : Saulot's Infernal Familiar Will Take Your Soul
> >> Author : Lasombra
> >> Description :
> >> Don't worry about your opponents playing vampires with the right
> >> disciplines. Steal anyone with Spirit Marionette, pass them an
> >> Infernal Familiar, and ensure that they return empty in torpor or
> >> burned. If the one you steal has dominate, let them play Spirit
> >> Marionette on their bleed at Obeah!
> >> Crypt [12 vampires] Capacity min: 2 max: 11 average: 7.25
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> 5x Saulot, The Wander 11 AUS FOR OBE THA VAL dai Salubri:4
> >> 2x Eurayle Gelasia My 6 AUS OBE for pre Salubri:4
> >> 2x Maldavis 4 AUS for pre Caitiff:3
> >> 1x Ladislas Toth, The 7 AUS DOM THA for archbishop !Tremere:3
> >> 1x Martin Franckel 3 AUS tha Tremere:3
> >> 1x Jacob, The Glitch 2 THA !Tremere:3
> >[snip]
> >Jeff,
> >I'm curious as to what made you go outside your standard
> >3x (or 4x) "star" vampire formula. Was there not enough
> >other vampires to fill in the crypt, so 5x seemed best?
>
> I could potentially add another Ladislas Toth and another Infernal
> Pact or two, and then go down to 4 Saulot, but I was screwed in my
> last tournament with only 4 copies of Qawiyya el-Ghaduba, and Saulot
> is even more critical to the success of this deck.
What maths say:
4 copies / 12 = 85,58% chances of having at least 1 copy in the
starting crypt.
5 copies / 12 = 92,92% " " "
5 copies / 13 = 90,20% " " "
6 copies / 12 = 96,96% " " "
6 copies / 13 = 95,10% " " "
It's cleary better to play 5 copies of the star vampire rather than 4,
and if you want to add another copy of another vampire, better play
with a 13 cards crypt.
Playing 6 copies out of 12 is only 4% better but may be justified.