[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Usa Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

Deck : Sennadurek's Machine

XZealot

11/28/2010 12:37:00 AM

Deck Name : Sennadurek's Machine
Author : Norman S. Brown, Jr
Description :
This is a Govern Crypt Machine that works on using Vampiric Disease to
force your prey to hunt where you can block them and play Mercy for
Seth to put them into torpor for Dragonbound to oust them.


Crypt [12 vampires] Capacity min: 1 max: 6 average: 5.08333
------------------------------------------------------------

5x Sennadurek 6 AUS NEC dom Nagaraja:4
1x Valois Sang, The W 6 AUS DOM nec tha Tremere:3
1x Zygodat 6 AUS NEC pot Harbinger:4
1x Nicomedes 5 aus for nec vic Harbinger:4
1x Solomon Batanea 5 AUS FOR nec Harbinger:4
1x Prejudice 4 aus dom nec Nagaraja:4
1x Tarautas 4 aus nec tha Tremere:4
1x Nedal, The Careles 1 cel nec Caitiff:3


Library [90 cards]
------------------------------------------------------------

Action [13]
12x Govern the Unaligned
1x Threading the Path of Orpheus

Action Modifier/Reaction [5]
5x Spectral Divination

Ally [1]
1x Carlton Van Wyk (Hunter)

Combat [17]
6x Aura Reading
11x Mercy for Seth

Equipment [5]
1x Bowl of Convergence
1x Erebus Mask
1x Ritual Scalpel
1x Sargon Fragment, The
1x Shaal Fragment

Event [1]
1x Dragonbound

Master [20]
3x Corporal Reservoir
1x Crematorium
8x Dominate
1x Fortschritt Library
1x Lazarene Inquisitor
1x Powerbase: Montreal
4x Vampiric Disease
1x Weeping Stone

Reaction [28]
6x Deflection
11x Eyes of Argus
4x My Enemy's Enemy
3x Precognition
4x Telepathic Misdirection


Crafted with : Anarch Revolt Deck Builder. [Sat Nov 27 18:35:39 2010]
5 Answers

Professor Bubba

3/3/2012 5:59:00 PM

0

In article <jit5vg$j4r$3@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

> bubba@nowhere.edu.invalid wrote:
> ><weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
> >> By Toby Harnden
>
> >> Andrew Breitbart, the conservative firebrand and new media pioneer who
> >> died suddenly at just 43, had told friends he was poised to take his
> >> jihad against the Left deeper into the mainstream media with a regular
> >> show on CNN.
> >>
> >> Last weekend, Breitbart told friends he was in early talks with CNN
> >> about a Crossfire-style show in which he would argue from the Right
> >> alongside former US House representative Anthony Weiner taking him on
> >> from the Left.
> >
> >CNN has already absolutely denied this.
> >You're behind the news again, but at least this time it's not by three
> >months.
>
> Take it up with Toby Harnden, who hasn't updated his article.

Except that I provided Harnden's update in my post. It's even in the
material you quoted.

This is exceptionally stupid, even for you.


> Still bitter about loosing that debate with me, I see.

Which debate did I "loose"?


> >> By DYLAN BYERS | 3/1/12 6:14 PM EST
> >> Earlier this evening, the Daily Mail's Toby Harnden?reported?that prior
> >> to his death, Andrew Breitbart said he was "in early talks with CNN
> >> about a Crossfire-style show" that he would co-host with former House
> >> Rep. Anthony Weiner.
> >> "Such a show could have been a blockbuster," Harnden wrote, because
> >> Breitbart's investigations into Weiner's Twitter photographs led to the
> >> end of his political career.
> >> Harnden reports that CNN had no comment on the matter. But a
> >> spokesperson with CNN tells me Harnden's report is "totally false."?
> >> "It's totallly false," CNN's Edie Emery said. "CNN was not in
> >> discussions."
> >> *UPDATE: Harnden emails:
> >> I didn't say as a fact CNN was in talks w Breitbart over the show. The
> >> headline and story attributes everything to Breitbart (plus one named
> >> person he said it to - feel free to contact her). The story is that
> >> Breitbart said he was in talks w CNN over a show with Weiner - that is
> >> 100 percent accurate. Could he have been lying/making it up? I suppose
> >> that's possible. Alas, we can't ask him.
> >> CNN had five hours to respond to my request for comment about what
> >> Breitbart said. They chose not to comment - and in fact didn't respond
> >> at all for 5 hours before I eventually got Emery on her cellphone.
> >
> >http://go...

BTW you keep including this:

> "Welcome to my killfile, boy. (Jeepers, you've won the "debate."
> Woo-hoo!)"
> -- Professor Bubba <bubba@nowhere.edu.invalid>


Let me explain it again: Yes, you're in my killfile. This prevents me
from having to look at all the O'Reilly drivel and Fuck-O-Meters and
whatever else you've decided to waste our time with that day. However,
when you post in a thread in which I'm participating, your kill score
rises and you escape my killfile on that occasion. Also, sometimes,
someone will actually quote you for some reason (usually to point out
what a jackass you are), and so I'll see that, too. Yes, I know I'm
wasting my time pointing all of this out yet again.

BTW, I've reset the followup that you changed without notice. Stupid
and cowardly -- wow, what a combo.

Not Sure

3/3/2012 6:45:00 PM

0

On Mar 3, 9:59 am, Professor Bubba <bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid> wrote:
> In article <jit5vg$j4...@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> > bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid wrote:
> > ><web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> > >> By Toby Harnden
>
> > >> Andrew Breitbart, the conservative firebrand and new media pioneer who
> > >> died suddenly at just 43, had told friends he was poised to take his
> > >> jihad against the Left deeper into the mainstream media with a regular
> > >> show on CNN.
>
> > >> Last weekend, Breitbart told friends he was in early talks with CNN
> > >> about a Crossfire-style show in which he would argue from the Right
> > >> alongside former US House representative Anthony Weiner taking him on
> > >> from the Left.
>
> > >CNN has already absolutely denied this.
> > >You're behind the news again, but at least this time it's not by three
> > >months.
>
> > Take it up with Toby Harnden, who hasn't updated his article.
>
> Except that I provided Harnden's update in my post.  It's even in the
> material you quoted.
>
> This is exceptionally stupid, even for you.
>
> > Still bitter about loosing that debate with me, I see.
>
> Which debate did I "loose"?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > >> By DYLAN BYERS | 3/1/12 6:14 PM EST
> > >> Earlier this evening, the Daily Mail's Toby Harnden reported that prior
> > >> to his death, Andrew Breitbart said he was "in early talks with CNN
> > >> about a Crossfire-style show" that he would co-host with former House
> > >> Rep. Anthony Weiner.
> > >> "Such a show could have been a blockbuster," Harnden wrote, because
> > >> Breitbart's investigations into Weiner's Twitter photographs led to the
> > >> end of his political career.
> > >> Harnden reports that CNN had no comment on the matter. But a
> > >> spokesperson with CNN tells me Harnden's report is "totally false."
> > >> "It's totallly false," CNN's Edie Emery said. "CNN was not in
> > >> discussions."
> > >> *UPDATE: Harnden emails:
> > >> I didn't say as a fact CNN was in talks w Breitbart over the show. The
> > >> headline and story attributes everything to Breitbart (plus one named
> > >> person he said it to - feel free to contact her). The story is that
> > >> Breitbart said he was in talks w CNN over a show with Weiner - that is
> > >> 100 percent accurate. Could he have been lying/making it up? I suppose
> > >> that's possible. Alas, we can't ask him.
> > >> CNN had five hours to respond to my request for comment about what
> > >> Breitbart said. They chose not to comment - and in fact didn't respond
> > >> at all for 5 hours before I eventually got Emery on her cellphone.
>
> > >http://go...
>
> BTW you keep including this:
>
> > "Welcome to my killfile, boy.  (Jeepers, you've won the "debate."
> > Woo-hoo!)"
> >         -- Professor Bubba <bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid>
>
> Let me explain it again: Yes, you're in my killfile.

There's no need to, dipshit. Get back on your knees, "Barb" requires
"her" daily suckage :)

This prevents me
> from having to look at all the O'Reilly drivel and Fuck-O-Meters and
> whatever else you've decided to waste our time with that day.  However,
> when you post in a thread in which I'm participating, your kill score
> rises and you escape my killfile on that occasion.  Also, sometimes,
> someone will actually quote you for some reason (usually to point out
> what a jackass you are), and so I'll see that, too.  Yes, I know I'm
> wasting my time pointing all of this out yet again.
>
> BTW, I've reset the followup that you changed without notice.  Stupid
> and cowardly -- wow, what a combo.

weberm

3/3/2012 8:17:00 PM

0

bubba@nowhere.edu.invalid wrote:
><weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> bubba@nowhere.edu.invalid wrote:
>> ><weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

>> >> By Toby Harnden
>>
>> >> Andrew Breitbart, the conservative firebrand and new media pioneer who
>> >> died suddenly at just 43, had told friends he was poised to take his
>> >> jihad against the Left deeper into the mainstream media with a regular
>> >> show on CNN.
>> >>
>> >> Last weekend, Breitbart told friends he was in early talks with CNN
>> >> about a Crossfire-style show in which he would argue from the Right
>> >> alongside former US House representative Anthony Weiner taking him on
>> >> from the Left.
>> >
>> >CNN has already absolutely denied this.
>> >You're behind the news again, but at least this time it's not by three
>> >months.
>>
>> Take it up with Toby Harnden, who hasn't updated his article.
>
>Except that I provided Harnden's update in my post. It's even in the
>material you quoted.
>
>This is exceptionally stupid, even for you.

Apparently your irrational hatred for me over loosing that debate to me
has severely affected your ability to think clearly. Perhaps you should
spend more time and effort on remembering I'm in your killfile instead your
desperate attempts at retaliation for losing debates with me.

--
"Welcome to my killfile, boy. (Jeepers, you've won the "debate."
Woo-hoo!)"
-- Professor Bubba <bubba@nowhere.edu.invalid>

Professor Bubba

3/3/2012 10:21:00 PM

0

In article <jitu7r$8c4$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
<weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

> bubba@nowhere.edu.invalid wrote:
> ><weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
> >> bubba@nowhere.edu.invalid wrote:
> >> ><weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>
> >> >> By Toby Harnden
> >>
> >> >> Andrew Breitbart, the conservative firebrand and new media pioneer who
> >> >> died suddenly at just 43, had told friends he was poised to take his
> >> >> jihad against the Left deeper into the mainstream media with a regular
> >> >> show on CNN.
> >> >>
> >> >> Last weekend, Breitbart told friends he was in early talks with CNN
> >> >> about a Crossfire-style show in which he would argue from the Right
> >> >> alongside former US House representative Anthony Weiner taking him on
> >> >> from the Left.
> >> >
> >> >CNN has already absolutely denied this.
> >> >You're behind the news again, but at least this time it's not by three
> >> >months.
> >>
> >> Take it up with Toby Harnden, who hasn't updated his article.
> >
> >Except that I provided Harnden's update in my post. It's even in the
> >material you quoted.
> >
> >This is exceptionally stupid, even for you.
>
> Apparently your irrational hatred for me over loosing [sic] that
> debate to me has severely affected your ability to think clearly.

You finally appear to realize that Harnden's update, which I supplied
in my original post, was part of the material you yourself quoted,
because you've cut that bit here.

Don't you understand how utterly stupid all of this makes you look?

> Perhaps you should
> spend more time and effort on remembering I'm in your killfile instead your
> desperate attempts at retaliation for losing debates with me.


I knew that explaining the killfile thing to you again would do no good
whatsoever, and I was right. Again.

Followups reset to where they belong. You're insane.

Remysun

3/5/2012 11:09:00 AM

0

On Mar 3, 12:59 pm, Professor Bubba <bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid> wrote:
> In article <jit5vg$j4...@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous

> > Still bitter about loosing that debate with me, I see.

> Which debate did I "loose"?

Apparently, the one about a bowel movement.