IAAH
6/10/2007 11:17:00 PM
Osprey wrote:
>
> "Vitor" <none@yahoo.net> wrote in message
> news:466c6cd0$0$4725$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> Osprey wrote:
>>>
>>> "Vitor" <none@yahoo.net> wrote in message
>>> news:466c529a$0$16591$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>> In article <466c3a34$0$5168$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
>>>>> Vitor <none@yahoo.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are a Republican I would suggest Delay's book. It is very
>>>>>> interesting. He embodies republican principles
>>>>>
>>>>> are you suggesting that all republicans should break the law and be
>>>>> indicted as delay was? (i agree that most republicans seem to
>>>>> emulate delay's criminal behavior.)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He was indited but not convicted I have not heard that the case will
>>>> even go to trial. His side of the story is that the Democrats
>>>> targeted him because he was effective in legislation much the same
>>>> way that Rove it targeted. From how I deal with the left here, I
>>>> would tend to agree they resort to such tactics. We have seen time
>>>> an again that the Democrats resort to character assassination and
>>>> legal maneuvers when they can't win democratically.
>>>
>>>
>>> You're statement makes sense. The way I look at it is both sides
>>> have their radicals, the extreme and dangerous.
>>>
>>> The right does have radicals..some refer to them as neocons.
>>>
>>> The left has it's radicals...they are the liberals.
>>>
>>> I try not to confuse the two. There are some good Democrats and
>>> there are some good Republicans. Both sides resort to low tactics.
>>>
>>> In this newsgroup, you will tend to come across the radical left..the
>>> liberal. It's not even worth discussing anything with them because
>>> they will never realize their own faults or errors. Everything is
>>> everyone else's fault, but never theirs. They do not take personal
>>> accountability or responsibility.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> What is a Neocon?
>
> The hell if I know, it's just a term that the liberals like to throw
> around.
So, you think you can write about it, but you don't
know what it means?
For that matter, you think you can write about
'liberals', but you refuse to acknowledge the meaning
of that word? Every time you use it, you are lying in
your application of the meaning.