[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Usa Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

talk.politics.animals

Re: 'Compassion Is The Fashion,' For The Holidays

pearl

1/2/2004 12:22:00 PM

"Jonathan Ball" <jonball@whitehouse.not> wrote in message
news:nQEIb.14192$lo3.4695@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> pearl wrote:
>
> > "Jonathan Ball" <jonball@whitehouse.not> wrote in message
> > news:bsEIb.14157$lo3.10705@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >
> >>pearl wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"Jonathan Ball" <jonball@whitehouse.not> wrote in message
> >>>news:RpDIb.14089$lo3.781@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>pearl wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>"Cylise" <cyli@visi.com> wrote in message news:l6h3vv00st0ib1rfhhriabven0q3csdrkt@4ax.com...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>all the other natural carnivores and omnioves.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>But humans are _not_ natural carnivorous omnivores.
> >>>>
> >>>>You are wrong. Humans are omnivores.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Wrong. Humans are not have no meat-eating adaptations.
> >>
> >>"are not have no"? Nice. That says it all.
> >
> > Says what, oh knowledgable one?
>
> Says that you are brutally stupid.

Your unethical modifying of what I wrote above
[was - Says what, oh 'knowledgable' (sic) one?]
says many things about you.
1. You are unethical.
2. You are dishonest.
3. You are a fool.

Your unethical modification of what I wrote makes it
appear that I mis-spelled 'knowledgeable', when in fact
it was you who STUPIDLY insisted that the correct
spelling was 'knowledgable'. Brutal stupid IDIOT.

> >>Anyway, wrong. We do have meat eating adaptations, or
> >>else we couldn't have eaten meat for the last
> >>15,000,000 years.
> >
> > Let's see your 'evidence'.
>
> It's all over the place at www.beyondveg.com; page
> after page after page of it.

So give us an example. (Billings' rantings don't count.)




1 Answer

Jonathan Ball

1/2/2004 5:59:00 PM

0

pearl wrote:

> "Jonathan Ball" <jonball@whitehouse.not> wrote in message
> news:nQEIb.14192$lo3.4695@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
>>pearl wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Jonathan Ball" <jonball@whitehouse.not> wrote in message
>>>news:bsEIb.14157$lo3.10705@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>pearl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Jonathan Ball" <jonball@whitehouse.not> wrote in message
>>>>>news:RpDIb.14089$lo3.781@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>pearl wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Cylise" <cyli@visi.com> wrote in message news:l6h3vv00st0ib1rfhhriabven0q3csdrkt@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>all the other natural carnivores and omnioves.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But humans are _not_ natural carnivorous omnivores.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You are wrong. Humans are omnivores.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Wrong. Humans are not have no meat-eating adaptations.
>>>>
>>>>"are not have no"? Nice. That says it all.
>>>
>>>Says what, oh knowledgable one?
>>
>>Says that you are brutally stupid.
>
>>>>Anyway, wrong. We do have meat eating adaptations, or
>>>>else we couldn't have eaten meat for the last
>>>>15,000,000 years.
>>>
>>>Let's see your 'evidence'.
>>
>>It's all over the place at www.beyondveg.com; page
>>after page after page of it.
>
>
> So give us an example. (Billings' rantings don't count.)

They do count. The utterly, totally, crushingly refute
you. They are citations from the REAL literature, not
from your BULLSHIT black-helicopter web pages.

You lose. Cunt.